Thursday, October 3, 2024


 SPRAYING FOR WEEDS @ BERWICK SPRINGS LAKE :  NO WARNING SIGNS VISIBLE 03/10/2024


https://youtu.be/cG-IdnsXxAo


This spraying, within a public park is very close to the footpath.  There was a slight breeze blowing and as I walked past, fine droplets of the herbicide made contact with my skin.

The company doing the spraying, has a contract with the local city council.   One of the statutory requirements is that warning signs must be erected.   The purpose of these signs is to ensure that unsuspecting members of the public, do not get sprayed / caught in spray drift, and can make an informed choice to actually avoid the area being sprayed.  

One would expect these signs to be right next to the footpath, perhaps 50 M before the man doing the spraying and 50 M after him doing the spraying, so that members approaching him from both ends of the footpath can be adequately warned ?   

Take note that he quadbike is moving whilst the man is doing the spraying. There is no "spotter"  and he does not see me approaching and carries on spraying. 

Most of the herbicides sprayed have with-holding periods and the Product Labels typically state " Do not enter the area that has been sprayed for x amount of days"  .   So how , in this case, would members of the public know to avoid the lawns etc post spraying ?   They would not know as there are no signs.

A way to help us all know that the area has been sprayed would be to add a blue harmless vegetable dye to the mix, but according to the city council, their contract with this particular contractor, does not allow for the use of the blue dye.   

The contractor did confirm that other city councils specifically request the use of blue dye so that members of the public can see what areas have been sprayed and thus avoid coming into contact with them. 

We would highly recommend that this particular city council specifically requests the addition of the blue dye and also instructs their contractors to put up visible  signage close to the areas being sprayed, for the safety of the residents who use this park. The residents who pay rates & taxes and thus keep the city council staff employed. 




Saturday, January 15, 2022

Carte Blanche Dec 2021

 Some footage of spraying shot in Riebeek Kasteel on Vloks Morester Farm - Het Vlock Kasteel 


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z79S9Ff-Qz8


Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Monday, September 7, 2020

 

THE HISTORY OF THE RIEBEEK KASTEEL SPRAY DRIFT ISSUE, CAN BE FOUND IN A   LETTER TO THE RIEBEEK BUSINESS FORUM


Click HERE

Saturday, September 5, 2020

RIEBEEK KASTEEL POISONED FRUIT

 MORE INFORMATION ON THE VIDEOS BELOW 


The videos below, documenting the spray drift from the vineyards of Riebeek Kasteel, were filmed between 2004  & 2009.

The were used as evidence to show that when the adjacent vineyards were sprayed, that large clouds of toxic spray drift blew out of the vineyards and into the residential area.

This evidence was used to obtain a successful  HIGH COURT ORDER, in the CAPE HIGH Court, against the farm / farmer concerned, interdicting him from spraying his vineyards in an unlawful manner. 

Despite the HIGH COURT ORDER , the farm/farmer continued to spray in a manner that resulted in clouds of highly toxic spray drift blowing out of the vineyards and into the residential area, in contempt of not only the HIGH COURT ORDER but also in contravention to Act36 of 1947 and thus the law, making such spraying a criminal offence under the law. 

The Schirmacher family needed to document the fact that the farmer in question was not following the terms and conditions of the HIGH COURT ORDER and was continuing to spray his vineyards in an unlawful manner. The only way to do this, was to film the unlawful spraying from the confines of the Schirmacher property in Riebeek Kasteel.   The videos below  ( these are only a few - there are many more)  show the extent of the spray drift.


EK IS GATVOL VIR JOU KAK ( I am fed up with your crap )